the IHRA working definition in local government

IHRA adoptions

We dated each decision by a city or other local government on the working definition of antisemitism of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) from the council's record where we found one, and from secondary sources where we did not.

 

We combined the decisions our searches found in council records with the lists of adoptions kept by three advocacy groups, the American Jewish Committee, the Combat Antisemitism Movement and the Campaign Against Antisemitism. Most rows come from those lists rather than from a council record, and the evidence column of each row states which source we used. Where two lists give different dates, we recorded both in the notes of the downloadable file. We drew a random sample of 60 rows dated from the lists and found a council record to compare for 16 of them: the council's date matched the list's to the day in 12 and to the month in 4. We could not check the rest, because the council's site blocked automated access or we found no record. In November 2026 we searched for the government's own record of each of the 523 local decisions taken from the lists, and found and read it for 441. For each of those decisions we list in the table the record, the decision it shows and the body that made it. The advocacy lists describe nearly all of these decisions as adoptions, while the councils' records show adoptions with the definition's examples and without them, adoptions with caveats, endorsements, proclamations, statements with no vote, and the definition placed inside an equality policy. The lists are incomplete, so the trend line shows when the recorded adoptions took place and does not count every local adoption. Where we know only the year of a decision, we placed it at 1 July of that year on the chart and the map and marked it in the table. Decisions with no known date appear in the table only.

Adoptions over time

This chart counts local adoptions cumulatively by date. Hover over the chart to read the count on any date.

Adoptions on the map

Press play, or drag the slider, to show the decisions made up to each month. A decision remains on the map from the month it was made. Where councils are close together, as in Britain, zoom in to separate the dots. Hollow circles mark motions that were rejected or withdrawn, and a ring marks a decision made in the twelve months to the date shown.

Decisions in the councils' own records

We count as an adoption a council vote that adopts or endorses the definition, and a council's adoption of a policy that includes the definition. An executive order or decree that binds the city's administration also counts, since it adopts the definition for the city, as does a proclamation that the council voted or that directs the city's departments to apply the definition. A ceremonial proclamation, a leader's statement or a declaration signed by a mayor forms a category of its own: we count these separately from adoptions, and the choice above the table shows them apart or combined. Where the record we found ends before the final vote, or does not mention the definition, we leave the case open until we find a fuller record.

counts as an adoptionceremonial proclamation or statement, counted separatelynot counted, or still open

Every decision

DatePlaceDecisionStatus and evidence

a project of

Lab for the Global Study of Antisemitism

This site is a team project of the Lab for the Global Study of Antisemitism, housed in the Anne Tanenbaum Centre for Jewish Studies at the University of Toronto.

Ron Levi and Sol Goldberg
ron.levi@utoronto.ca

Research Team: Cypress Chernik, Lir Josefsohn, and Arianna Seijts, all of whom are undergraduate interns at the Lab for the Global Study of Antisemitism.

This is a work in progress. Corrections and missing adoptions, with their dates, are welcome.